As we discussed in part 2, the Automated Home’s base line energy usage is terrible. There’s no point producing all this energy as well as then throwing it away.
But which are the most inefficient appliances? In an effort to discover out I chose to work my method round the house room by room, measuring each gadget that’s permanently plugged in as well as powered on.
I’m not declaring these figures are very accurate. I utilized an earlier version of this Energenie Power screen to take the measurements. Some device’s consumption varied wildly over time, some may reach a deeper sleep level than I determined at while others determined 0.00 where they were clearly consuming at least some power (if relatively little).
With that said, here’s a few of the results that I discovered many interesting.
The Interesting Stuff
Our 8 year old (and still fabulous) Pioneer Plasma is one of the most significant energy guzzlers in the home at almost a third of a kilowatt when in use. Thankfully believed it has a sensible (for its age) 0.9 watt standby.
Our Philips shade White bulbs determine 0.00 when ‘off’ whilst the similar Belkin WeMo bulb showed a 0.7 watt usage in the exact same state.
In the research study our seldom utilized HP laser printer topped out at over 700w while in use. It’s standby usage was difficult to determine as it different a lot, however it’s now unplugged.
The home WiFi was offered by an Apple flight terminal extreme that utilized a constant 9w.
The bedside PortaPow USB chargers determined 0.00 on standby whilst our newer Anker PowerPort 6 idles at almost 1 watt.
A 32″ LG TV in one of the bedrooms halved it’s usage (going from around 120w in utilize to 68w) by setting energy saver to medium. It’s standby usage is 0.9w.
Two screens on one of the PCs showed exactly how things have moved on recently. An older 19″ LCD screen consumes much more than 2.5 times the power in utilize of a contemporary as well as larger 24″ LED panel (18w vs 47w)
Sony’s PS4 costs next to nothing on Standby whilst the PS3 may expense you around a quid a year.
Sonos & sky Shock
One of the most significant surprises was our Sonos system with some extremely high standby values. The S5 (Play:5 predecessor) was the greatest measuring 8.8w in standby. My readings agree with the official sonos values too implying our 7 piece system costs almost £40 a year on standby. Aj.
We like our new sky Q system (read our evaluation here) however it has a filthy bit trick too. It costs practically £60 per year to run the primary box plus the 3 minis. I went searching for the official usage figures for the new sky boxes as well as here’s the practical line from the specs…
Total energy usage according to Voluntary Industry contract for complex STBs
Hmmmm.
Scheduled Savings
My son’s bedroom has a great deal of kit, including a gaming PC rig with 2 monitors, TV, Sonos etc. We discovered this system on its own ate 28w with whatever in standby. We separated off his network switch as well as WiFi gain access to point as well as linked the rest to a SmartThings Power outlet (£45) and set a routine where it’s only on a few hours each day now.
This makes economic sense with a payback time of around 2 years on the wise switch. much less with something like the Energenie Mi|Home module that’s less than £10 as well as compatible with IFTTT (once you add the Energenie Gateway).
Other items like this 1.8w Ikea LED hall light costs a bit over £2 per year to run 24/7 so adding any type of type of automation would most likely not make economic sense.
Good guideline of Thumb
Taking today’s electrical power costs (£0.1343 for us currently) then here’s a great guideline of thumb to work out a rough annual running costs of a 24/7 device.
Taking its score in watts as well as multiply it by 1.2 provides you a rough expense in £’s. For example we determined our Synology 1813+ NAS as utilizing 46 watts…
46 watts x 1.2 = £55 annual running cost
So if the Synology serves us for around 7 years – the time our 2 previous house servers lasted – then this single gadget will have burnt with almost £400 worth of electricity. Sobering thought.
Low energy Appliances
There are other gadgets around the house which we couldn’t determine quickly – for example a huge rack of X10 dimmers as well as appliance modules in the loft, different central heating elements etc.
It’s something extremely few of us do, however we ought to all be taking a look at power usage figures for the products we buy, especially fridges as well as freezers – where you ought to opt for A+ or better. things have got a great deal much better in recent times with sellers showing annual running costs for appliances now.
Fridges as well as Freezers are much more challenging to determine since of the stop / begin nature of their motors. In a future part of this evaluation series we’ll look at a modern eNergy -skärm som kan ge dig många av denna information, inklusive för privat apparat, utan allt detta svåra arbete …
Energenie energibesparande kraftmätare
(698)
£ 16,99
köp på Amazon
Decdeal LCD -skärm ELEKTRISK POWER ANVÄNDNING POWER METER …
(82)
£ 16,99
köp på Amazon
Lowenergie Plug-in Energy Screen Power Meter …
(297)
£ 11,99
köp på Amazon
Läs den fullständiga solserien …
Going Solar Part 1 – Installera ett 4KW PV -sortiment hos det automatiserade hemmet
Going Solar Part 2 – Kostnader, incitament och återbetalningstid
Going Solar Part 3 – Jag handlade i min Variety Rover för ett Nissan Leaf
Going Solar Part 4 – Jag bestämmer varje 24/7 elektrisk gadget i det automatiserade hemmet
Going Solar Part 5 – Våra PV -system Faktiska generationssiffror efter det första hela året
Going Solar Part 6 – Hela allra första års “bränslekostnader för Nissan Leaf EV – 235 £
Dela detta:
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Linkedin
Pinterest
E-post
Mer
Whatsapp
Skriva ut
Skype
Tumblr
Telegram
Ficka
Senaste uppdateringen 2021-10-04 / affiliate-länkar / bilder från Amazon Product Marketing API